Economist reacts to podcast guests bashing economic science

Money & Macro · 2025-11-18 · 29 min
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzxd5I-EzyAVideo summary
Joeri argues economics is real social science, while debating Gary’s forecasts, Michael Saylor’s model critique, and Steve Keen’s education warning.
Economist Joeri responds to three common attacks on economics: that it is not real science, that its models are outdated, and that studying it is pointless. He agrees macroeconomics cannot match laboratory sciences: millions of people and firms interact, humans adapt, and policy responses can change the outcomes economists predict. But a trader’s successful forecasts are not proof of reliable skill; even professionals can be beaten by random stock picks, monkeys, or a cat. On models, Joeri says standard versions can omit bank-created money and inequality, while richer agent-based models capture more detail but become difficult to understand and debug. He also notes that research has advanced faster than university curricula, partly because teaching resources and time are limited. His conclusion: economics is imperfect but scientific, and students should seek departments that teach varied schools of thought, economic history, and empirical methods alongside mathematical models.
Chapters
- 0:00Intro: Joeri and Alejandro frame three criticisms of economics
- 1:19Economists’ predictions: COVID policy and human behavior complicate experiments
- 6:44Gary’s second claim: why a strong trading record may not prove forecasting skill
- 11:07Advertising sponsor: Ekster wallets, finder card, and a 10% promo discount
- 12:39Are economic models outdated? Agent-based models and DSGE feedback
- 16:37Richard Werner: bank money creation and newer macroeconomic models
- 21:09Gary’s take on economic models: representative agents omit inequality
- 24:10Is economic education bad? Teaching lags behind research, but Joeri still recommends studying economics
- 26:38Conclusion: economics is real science, and students should seek progressive, empirical programs
This is a Tier 1 public summary
Whether the chapter key points, section summaries and mind map are public is up to the person who shared it. Want the full analysis?Submit one yourself.
More from this channel
Why Gen-Z cannot find a job anymoreMoney & MacroAI is squeezing entry-level hiring, while Trump’s tariffs and the end of COVID stimulus deepen the jobs slowdown.
Why China's mineral monopoly can still be brokenMoney & MacroChina controls about 95% of rare-earth refining and magnet production, prompting a five-step plan for Western supply-chain independence.
How scientists radically reduced US gun violence (no gun ban)Money & MacroPhiladelphia lot cleanups cut gun violence nearly 30%, while Chicago’s Becoming a Man program reduced violent arrests 45–50%.
The 5 megatrends that will dominate 2026Money & MacroJuri forecasts China’s industrial rise, debt constraints, an AI bubble surviving 2026, and a 25% chance of a Taiwan blockade.
The distorted economics of mass mediaMoney & MacroSequels now dominate Hollywood’s top 20, but cheaper production has fueled a thriving creative long tail.

